MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2186025946

Recruiting Talent in the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Sector: What Role for Immigration?

2013· article· en· W2186025946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mikal Skuterud

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor market dynamics and wage inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyImmigrationGovernment (linguistics)Position (finance)BusinessEconomic shortageInformation technologyEconomic growthPublic relationsPolitical scienceEconomicsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immigration has played a critical role in the growth of the Canadian Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector over the past two decades. In the face of declining domestic post-secondary education enrollment rates in ICT fields of study, it appears that further ICT sector expansion will continue to rely heavily on sources of foreign-educated workers. This report provides a broad discussion of the main challenges the government faces in providing an immigration system that will meet the future needs of the sector, not only in terms of filling existing labour market shortages, but also in term of proactive policy enabling employers to compete for the world's most talented high-tech workers, thereby putting Canada in a position to be an international leader in ICT. In addition, it describes key recent changes in Canada's permanent and temporary immigration programs of relevance to the ICT sector, in each case emphasizing to what extent the programs are likely to address the policy challenges facing the sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLabor market dynamics and wage inequality→French-language works237,207→