Exflagellating <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> in Peripheral Blood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3-year-old boy originally from Pakistan developed a high fever (temperature, 40°C) accompanied by rigors and chills. The boy had moved to Canada with his family 1 year before presentation. He had previously been well. There was no history of recent travel, no other family members were ill, and immunizations were up to date. The findings on physical exam were noncontributory.A vial of EDTA-anticoagulated blood was submitted to the laboratory approximately 50 minutes after the blood was drawn from the boy in the emergency department. A peripheral smear and complete blood cell count were immediately generated. The count revealed mild anemia and moderate thrombocytopenia: hemoglobin, 8.2 g/dL (age-specific reference range, 10.7–13.1 g/dL); hematocrit, 23.6% (reference range, 33.0%–39.0%); platelet count, 88 × 103/μL (reference range, 180–440 × 103/μL). Review of the peripheral smear identified occasional spherocytes and large platelet forms. The most significant finding was a parasitemia, with 1% to 2% of erythrocytes containing malarial ring forms and macrogametocytes. These were morphologically speciated as Plasmodium vivax. In addition, exflagellating microgametocytes were easily found (Figures 1 and 2, Giemsa stain, original magnification ×100).The life cycle of Plasmodium organisms in humans, or schizogony, is characterized by asexual reproduction. Sporozoites are injected into the circulation from the salivary glands of a carrier mosquito. After an extraerythrocytic (hepatic) merozoite stage, the parasite infects erythrocytes. Maturing into the trophozoite (ring form) stage, the parasite may divide still further to form more merozoites, or may undergo gametogony, to form male microgametocytes and female macrogametocytes. The classic Plasmodium falciparum banana-shaped gametocyte is one example. Gametocytes are typically ingested by the female Anopheles mosquito as part of a blood meal, and the parasite's sexual reproductive phase (sporogony) occurs within the mosquito gut. One of the first steps in the sexual phase is the exflagellation of microgametocytes. Up to 8 long slender flagella (Figures) extend out of each male microgametocyte within approximately 20 minutes of ingestion by the mosquito1 and subsequently detach as flagellar microgametes. Although other factors are contributory, exflagellation is thought to be stimulated primarily by a rise in pH,1 as may occur in the blood within the mosquito proboscis en route to the mosquito gut. The sexual phase of the Plasmodium life cycle is completed with the fertilization of a macrogamete by a flagellar microgamete, and the subsequent generation of sporozoites.Exflagellated microgametes, which are usually found only within the mosquito, have been occasionally noted in the peripheral blood of patients with malaria. As was noted by Manson2 as early as 1894, flagellated forms are not identified in freshly prepared peripheral blood smears, but may instead be seen after the blood has been exposed to air for several minutes. As the CO2 level in the blood quickly falls, to equilibrate with the surrounding air, the pH of the plasma rises, and exflagellation may begin.1 In usual clinical laboratory conditions (in vitro), it is not common to find the high blood pH (>7.7) that is thought necessary to allow exflagellation.3 Sufficiently high pH levels may be obtained in the plasma of blood samples collected into EDTA-containing tubes, if the samples are left unstoppered and unagitated overnight.3 However, exflagellation may be readily observed in a drop of Plasmodium-infected blood left exposed to air on a microscope slide.1There is no clinical significance attached to the presence of exflagellated malarial forms in peripheral blood, apart from the possibility of misdiagnosis. Although their respective morphologies are quite different, exflagellated microgametes may potentially be mistaken for other flagellated parasites such as Trypanosoma cruzi.3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".