MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186048650 · doi:10.2166/wqrj.2008.015

Potato Land Use and Nitrate Runoff Characteristics of Two Subcatchments of the Wilmot River Watershed, Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada

2008· article· en· W2186048650 on OpenAlexaffabout
Linnell M. Edwards, Michael Brimacombe, Allan H. MacRae

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Quality Research Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Prince Edward IslandAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface runoffNitrateEnvironmental scienceWatershedHydrology (agriculture)Arable landHectareGeographyEcologyAgricultureGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two subcatchments in the upper reaches of an arable watershed in central Prince Edward Island (PEI), farmed mostly to potatoes (in rotation), were monitored year-round for nitrate runoff. Land management inventories were done every fall and spring and assessed against nitrate runoff through regression analysis for the period 1991 to 2004. Nitrate concentration (averaging approximately 7 mg L-1 over 14 years) in the outflow varied considerably yearly (standard deviation: 2.76) and monthly (standard deviation: 3.43), and exceeded quality guidelines (of 13 mg L-1) for aquatic life in freshwaters at about a 6% frequency, averaging a nitrate-dollar loss of $1.70 per hectare per year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Quality Research JournalSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207