MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186063995

THE TRANSITION FROM AN AUTONOMOUS TO AN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT MODEL: A SELECTION OF CANADIAN TAX ISSUES

2005· article· en· W2186063995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nick Pantaleo, C. Andrew McAskile, Christopher P. Kong, Liam M. Fitzgerald

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinational corporationBusinessCore (optical fiber)Focus (optics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Industrial organizationProcess managementTransition (genetics)Knowledge managementMarketingComputer scienceTelecommunicationsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a changing business environment, a multinational enterprise (MNE) may reorganize the way in which it manages and operates its diversified businesses. For example, an MNE may choose to move away from an autonomous management model, which allows each diversified business to operate as if it were an independent entity, to an integrated or centralized management model, which allows the MNE to focus on its core business. Using the example of a US-owned Canadian company whose management is relocated to the United States, the authors examine a selection of Canadian cross-border tax issues that should be considered both during and after the transition from an autonomous to a centralized management model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0260.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207