MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186091428

SYNTHESIS OF POLY (L-LACTIC ACID) BY EHYDROPOLYCONDENSATION, DETERMINATION OF SEQUENCE BY 13C NMR METHOD

2012· article· en· W2186091428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Asutosh Kumar Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCondensation polymerLactic acidPolyesterPolymerizationMolar mass distributionCarbon-13 NMRPolymer chemistryInterfacial polymerizationOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringPolymerMonomer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed work was undertaken to synthesize high molecular weight PLA by direct polycondensation to find its better applicability in fiberapplication, packaging material and commodity. However, it was reported that it was very difficult to obtain high molecular weight PLA by directpolycondensation because of equilibrium between free acids, water and polyesters causing difficulty in removing water as a by-product. The effectof various solvents (polar and non polar) and reaction temperatures were also investigated. In this contribution, the influence of process variableson the molecular weight of PLA synthesized by direct polycondensation will be highlighted. We report the use of high-resolution 13C-NMR (125MHz) spectroscopy to identify the sterosequence distribution and determine stereo specific preference for L-lactic acid addition during tin chloridedihydrate (SnCl2.2H2O) catalyzed polymerization, and effect of various specific polymerization conditions such as temperature, duration of reactionand the nature of solvents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207