Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here that intracellular pH (pH(i)) in cleavage-stage human embryos (2-8-cell) is regulated by at least two mechanisms: the HCO(3)(-)/Cl(-) exchanger (relieves alkalosis) and the Na(+)/H(+) antiporter (relieves acidosis). The mean pH(i) of cleavage-stage embryos was 7.12 +/- 0.008 (n = 199) with little variation between different stages. Embryos demonstrated robust recovery from alkalosis that was appropriately Cl(-)-dependent, indicating the presence of the HCO(3)(-)/Cl(-) exchanger. This was further confirmed by measuring the rate of intracellular alkalinization upon Cl(-) removal, which was markedly inhibited by the anion transport inhibitor, 4,4'-diisocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulphonic acid, disodium salt. The set-point of the HCO(3)(-)/Cl(-) exchanger was between pH(i) 7.2 and 7.3. Embryos also exhibited Na(+)-dependent recovery from intracellular acidosis. Na(+)/H(+) antiporter activity appeared to regulate recovery up to about pH(i) 6.8; this recovery was HCO(3)(-)-independent and amiloride-sensitive, with a pH(i) set-point of approximately 6.8-6.9. A second system that was both Na(+)- and HCO(3)(-)-dependent appeared to mediate further recovery from acidosis up to about pH(i) 7.1. Thus, pH(i) of early human preimplantation embryos appears to be regulated by opposing mechanisms (HCO(3)(-)/Cl(-) exchanger, Na(+)/H(+) antiporter, and possibly a third acid-alleviating transporter that was both Na(+)- and HCO(3)(-)-dependent) resulting in the maintenance of pH(i) within a narrow range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".