MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy and safety of oral NSAIDs and analgesics in the management of osteoarthritis: Evidence from real-life setting trials and surveys

2015· article· en· W2186274000 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Pierre Pelletier, Johanne Martel‐Pelletier, François Rannou, Cyrus Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisDiclofenacNabumetoneNaproxenTramadolIbuprofenCelecoxibAdverse effectInternal medicineLower riskAnalgesicAnesthesiaPharmacologyConfidence intervalNonsteroidalAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are at the cornerstone of treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). In recent years, the widespread use of oral NSAIDs has been called into question due to the appearance of significant upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications and cardiovascular (CV) adverse events (AEs). However, NSAIDs are non-homogeneous, and there are noticeable differences between them in AE risk for GI and CV events. Nevertheless, if properly prescribed oral NSAIDs can provide an effective and safe treatment for OA in real-life situations. The identification of patients with significant CV and/or GI risk is critical, and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) treatment algorithm provides guidance on appropriate treatments for OA patients with elevated risk. Among non-selective NSAIDs, ibuprofen and naproxen seem preferable to diclofenac, the latter being associated with higher CV risk. Recommendation has been made by some that naproxen may be the preferred agent in patients at high CV risk because of its lower risk of CV events. Low dose celecoxib (200mg/day) is also associated with a lower risk of CV events compared with other coxibs. In addition, drugs with a demonstrated low GI risk profile may be of benefit, such as coxibs and nabumetone. Among patients who fail to respond adequately to sequential ESCEO algorithm Step 1 and Step 2 treatments, the short-term use of weak opioids, such as tramadol, for severely symptomatic OA patients is recommended. Although studies exploring the efficacy of tramadol in OA are limited, there is good evidence that tramadol works if prescribed properly. The sustained-release (SR) formulation of tramadol is preferred as it avoids the peak plasma concentrations reached with immediate-release tramadol, and is believed to reduce the incidence of AEs. Furthermore, slow upwards titration of tramadol SR is recommended to improve tolerability and minimize treatment discontinuations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations158
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Arthritis and RheumatismSame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207