Microseismic and seismic denoising via ensemble empirical mode decomposition and adaptive thresholding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Random and coherent noise exists in microseismic and seismic data, and suppressing noise is a crucial step in seismic processing. We have developed a novel seismic denoising method, based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) combined with adaptive thresholding. A signal was decomposed into individual components called intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Each decomposed signal was then compared with those IMFs resulting from a white-noise realization to determine if the original signal contained structural features or white noise only. A thresholding scheme then removed all nonstructured portions. Our scheme is very flexible, and it is applicable in a variety of domains or in a diverse set of data. For instance, it can serve as an alternative for random noise removal by band-pass filtering in the time domain or spatial prediction filtering in the frequency-offset domain to enhance the lateral coherence of seismic sections. We have determined its potential for microseismic and reflection seismic denoising by comparing its performance on synthetic and field data using a variety of methods including band-pass filtering, basis pursuit denoising, frequency-offset deconvolution, and frequency-offset empirical mode decomposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".