Construction of the Capability Maturity Model of Dynamic Strategic Cost Management on Real Estate Development Enterprises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real estate development enterprises are in the process of gradually mature, and its dynamic strategic cost management is also from generation to development gradually mature process. How to effectively grasp the real estate development enterprise dynamic strategic cost management stage, and look for the pushing direction and key process of evolution of dynamic strategic cost management of real estate development enterprise. There is still a lack of standardized procedures and methods. The capability maturity model can reveal the characteristics of the things that are in the process of the development, in line with the characteristics of real estate development enterprise dynamic strategic cost management and construction requirement. Therefore, this paper establishes the dynamic strategic cost management capability maturity model of real estate development enterprises from seven aspects: customer, market, product, process, organization, technology, government and society, which combined the framework of Capability Maturity Model with the actual characteristics of the real estate development enterprise dynamic strategic cost management. It studies the properties and characteristics of each grade real estate development enterprise dynamic strategic cost management, and analysis of low grade to high grade key process area evolution, to provide theoretical and practical guidance for the dynamic strategic cost management in real estate enterprise
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".