MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186372546 · doi:10.13140/2.1.5015.8404

Temporal features extraction for the binaural soundscape samples

2014· article· en· W2186372546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daiwei Wang, Zhiyong Deng, Xinxin Li, Aili Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicNoise Effects and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoundscapeBinaural recordingEvent (particle physics)Envelope (radar)Sound (geography)Computer scienceAcousticsHistoryGeographySpeech recognitionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soundscape, earlier proposed by the Canadian composer and ecologist R. Murray Schafer in 1960s, contains a large amount of environmental information and event information for the expression of specific historic areas, the survival status of a particular nation or people, and especially, the native environment has important significance. 22 binaural recorded soundscape samples collected from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China and their temporal features, included IACF, IACC, temporal envelope, acoustical dynamic were introduced in this paper. The information of native location, sound event and the above temporal features are also highly corresponded to the keynote, sound signal and soundmark of the soundscape. The preliminary results in this paper can provider an important theoretical and practical significance for the further extraction and analysis for the acoustical parameters of soundscapes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNoise Effects and ManagementFrench-language works237,207