Avaliação da dor no pós-operatório de cesariana através da utilização do questionário de Mcgill
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Pain is a common postoperative symptom. Unlike other surgeries, in the postoperative period of Caesarean sections patients don’t get much rest because they must take care of their newborn babies. Brazil has one of the highest Caesarean rates in the world, and, thus, knowledge of pain perception in women in the postoperative period of Caesarean operations may help establish new routines in the use of painkillers. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess pain in the postoperative period following Caesarean sections using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. This instrument assesses the sensory, evaluative, affective and miscellaneous components of pain. Pain was assessed 36 to 48 hours after surgery when the anesthetic drugs were already metabolized in the body. Material and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study with women who had Caesarean section during the December 2010-May 2011 period. 120 women undergoing Caesarean sections at the Instituto Fernandes Figueira- FIOCRUZ, without surgery complication participated in the study. Results: Pain after Caesarean operation did not differ in terms of age, race and family income. The pain had higher scores in the cognitive-evaluative field in those patients with higher education levels and in the miscellaneous field in patients with lower education levels. The affective component of PRI in unmarried patients was higher compared to patients living with a partner. There was no difference in pain score compared to the number of previous Caesarean sections. Mothers with their babies in the NICU had higher score in the miscellaneous component of PRI than mothers rooming-in with their babies Mothers anesthetized with morphine had higher scores in the total PRI, sensory and evaluative components when compared to the mothers given an opioid such as fentanyl. Women with indication for Caesarean section during labor showed higher scores for the evaluative component of pain compared to women who had elective Caesarean section. Conclusions: Most women (93.3%) reported that postoperative pain intensity is moderate to severe despite the regular use of painkillers. Yet, 88.3% of the mothers were very satisfied or satisfied with the medication prescribed for pain relief. The use of routine assessment of the level of pain perceived by pregnant women can provide greater well-being in the postoperative period when these women must have plenty of energy to take care of their babies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".