MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186400925 · doi:10.21307/ijssis-2017-505

Visual Attention Model with Adaptive Weighting of Conspicuity Maps for Building Detection in Satellite Images

2012· article· en· W2186400925 on OpenAlexafffund
Ana-Maria Creţu, Pierre Payeur

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersFedDev Ontario
KeywordsWeightingComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)Context (archaeology)Similarity (geometry)InferenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Identification (biology)Data miningMachine learningImage (mathematics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The lack of automation and the limited performance of current image processing techniques pose critical challenges to the efficient and timely use of the large amount of data made available by aerial and space based assets. The imitation of fast adaptation and inference capability of human visual system appears to be a promising research direction for the development of computational algorithms able to deal with large variations in image content, characteristics and scale as those encountered in satellite imaging. The paper explores the potential use of an improved computational model of visual attention for the complex task of building identification in satellite images. It contributes to extend the envelope of application areas of such models and also to expand their current use from single object to multiple object detection. A set of original weighting schemes based on the contribution of different features to the identification of building and non-building areas is first proposed and evaluated against existing solutions in the literature. A novel adaptive algorithm then chooses the best weighting scheme based on a similarity error to ensure the best performance of the attention model in a given context. Finally, a neural network is trained to predict the set of weights provided by the best weighting scheme for the context of the image in which buildings are to be detected. The solution provides encouraging results on a set of 50 satellite images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent SystemsSame topicVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFrench-language works237,207