Subpixel image matching based on Fourier phase correlation for Radarsat-2 stereo-radargrammetry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Image matching is the major step in the radargrammetric process to measure elevation parallax. To extract parallax from stereo synthetic aperture radar images the subpixel image matching method based on Fourier phase correlation was implemented with an algorithm using the hierarchical multiresolution approach and applied to Fine Quad mode Radarsat-2 data. The experimental results with simulated images show that a decrease in intersection angle leads to an increase in matching accuracy of up to 0.06 of a pixel. To validate the matching results a digital surface model was extracted from the real stereo pair and compared with accurate lidar data. The statistics show that there are good improvements (in the order of 10%–20%) in the accuracy over results extracted using a traditional image matching technique based on the normalized cross-correlation. The analysis of the mutual dependence of matching accuracy and stereo pair configurations shows that the application of subpixel matching allows us to make the ra...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it