MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186627438

The Effect of Galileo on Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution

2001· article· en· W2186627438 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Alves

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalileo (satellite navigation)Ambiguity resolutionGlobal Positioning SystemGNSS applicationsReal Time KinematicAmbiguityConstellationComputer scienceSatellite systemSatellite navigationSatelliteRemote sensingGeodesyGeographyTelecommunicationsEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

and is continuing his studies, towards a Ph.D. in Geomatics Engineering, in the field of positioning of navigation at the University of Calgary. In order to achieve the highest level of positioning accuracy using GPS, one must first determine the carrier phase integer ambiguities. This will also be true with the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) proposed by the European Union, Galileo. This paper discusses the effect of the proposed satellite system, GPS, and an integrated solution of the two systems on ambiguity resolution in kinematic mode. This paper will examine the effectiveness of ambiguity resolution with Galileo, GPS, and a combined solution. The addition of the Galileo constellation will increase the efficiency and reliability of ambiguity resolution when combined with GPS. The addition of 30 satellites transmitting with L-Band frequencies will decrease the time required for a user to wait before determining the correct integer ambiguities and therefore decrease the time before achieving the best possible position accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207