MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186644695 · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)85555-x

10.1016/s0967-0653(97)85555-x

2000· article· en· W2186644695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Helge Løseth, E. Tveten

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousRidgePaleontologySubsidenceFault (geology)CenozoicPeriod (music)BasementAptianSedimentary rockGeomorphologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

to surface temperature in mid-Juras­ sic. During the early to mid-Jurassic, a smooth, peneplained basement relief developed throughout the area. In mid-Jurassic, a period of normal faulting, subsidence and sedimentation was initiated and large parts of the Lofoten/Vesteral en off-and onshore areas subsided. Faulting occurred more or less continuously throughout the mid-Jurassic to early Cretaceous, but the !argest fault movements took place during the early Cretaceous, presumably in Albian to Aptian times. During the early Cretaceous, the Lofoten Ridge developed as a horst while the surrounding areas (Vesteralen/Ando ya and sedimentary basins) subsided below a several km thick Lower Cretaceous succession. The final rifting phase during late Cretaceous and Palaeocene was focused west of the Utrost Ridge and Andoya, bul minor faulting also occurred throughout the Andoya/Vesterale n/Lofoten area. During a late Cenozoic compressional phase the entire Lofoten and Vesteralen margin east of the present shelf edge was uplifted and eroded. The erosion and resulting isostatic uplift continued throughout the glacial period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0080.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9890.992

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207