MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186651478

Мировая практика использования бюджетного федерализма в экономической систе- Ме государств федеративного типа

2010· article· ru· W2186651478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Кибилдс Андрис Андрисович

Bibliographic record

VenueРоссийский внешнеэкономический вестник · 2010
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Government Finance and Decentralization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFederalismEconomicsPolitical sciencePublic economicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В настоящей статье автором рассмотрены процессы бюджетного федерализма в мире. Обоснованы основные принципы и направления бюджетного стимулирования экономического роста регионов на основе использования положительного прогрессивного опыта наиболее успешных федеративных государств (США, Канада, Германия).In this article the author considers processes of budgetary federalism in the word. The main principles and directions of budgetary stimulation of economic growth in the regions on the basis of using the positive progressive experience of the most successful federative states (USA, Canada, Germany) are proved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueРоссийский внешнеэкономический вестникSame topicLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationFrench-language works237,207