MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186667609

Transgressive Sandstone Sedimentology of the Albian Martin House Formation, Peel Region, Northwest Territories

2013· article· en· W2186667609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Hadlari, Danielle Thomson, Claudia J. Schröder-Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentologyTransgressiveProgradationMarine transgressionSubmarine pipelineFaciesSedimentary depositional environmentPaleontologyMarlGeomorphologyGeochemistryOceanographyStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Excerpt In the Peel Region of NWT the 10-50 m thick Martin House Formation records Albian transgression of the Western Interior Seaway. Martin House Formation comprises up to 3 sandstone units separated by intervals of offshore mudstone. The 5-10 m thick basal sandstone records a transgressive facies succession from upper to lower shoreface sandstones overlain by offshore mudstone. A proposed depositional model for the lower sandstone consists of wave-dominated barrier bar deposits in the west and restricted, tide-influenced deposits in the east. Upper Martin House Formation sandstone units record shoreface progradation from east to west. The uppermost sandstone is overlain by an up to 1 km thickness of Arctic Red Formation offshore mudstone. Within the Martin House Formation reservoir properties are more favourable in eastern, marginal marine sandstones (>15% porosity; >50 mD permeability).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207