From the margins to the majority: the possibility of a liberal education in liquid times
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La plupart des philosophes d'éducation libérale se concentrent sur les problèmes d'accommodation et de reconnaissance des cultures minoritaires dans les sociétés pluralistes. Alors que cela reste une tâche très importante, je soutiens qu'il y a des tendances inquiétantes dans la culture majoritaire qui méritent une critique philosophique par les libéraux. Dans cette thèse je mets en parallèle le programme pédagogique du philosophe libéral Eamonn Callan et les critiques des penseurs de la théorie sociale sur l'influence du marché qui ne cesse d'augmenter dans notre culture. Je maintiens qu'il faut aborder les problèmes découlant de cette influence si les libéraux veulent traduire concrètement leurs principes pédagogiques en modes de pratique faisable. Je conclus en suggérant trois façons par lesquelles un dialogue entre les libéraux et les penseurs de la théorie sociale peut aborder ces tendances inquiétantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".