MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186791265 · doi:10.36510/learnland.v2i2.308

Theatre of Possibility: Performative Inquiry as Heuristic, Holistic, and Integrative Learning

2009· article· en· W2186791265 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dorothy Lichtblau

Bibliographic record

VenueLEARNing Landscapes · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerformative utteranceEmbodied cognitionDramaExperiential learningDialecticPedagogyCurriculumSociologyAestheticsPsychologyEpistemologyArtVisual artsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper illustrates what Performative Inquiry, an embodied, interpretive and dialectical means of investigating curriculum, may contribute to teaching and learning. By contextualizing the discourse in a workshop on drama as a way to study Anne Frank’s Diary of a Young Girl, I demonstrate that Performative Inquiry builds on learners’ experience and knowledge and recognizes their perceptions of who they are within certain contexts. I show, too, that this educative practice provokes critical thinking, increases self-understanding, and permits greater integration of mind and body. My overarching aim is to demonstrate that Performative Inquiry is a practice that fosters personal and community development

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLEARNing LandscapesSame topicTheatre and Performance StudiesFrench-language works237,207