MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186826974

AC Electroosmotic Fluid Flow in Electrolytes Generated by Two Coplanar Microelectrodes

2006· article· en· W2186826974 on OpenAlex
Kazimierz Adamiak

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechConnect Briefs · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldLaplace's equationMechanicsElectrohydrodynamicsChemistryElectrolyteElectrodeDebye lengthElectric potentialElectro-osmosisLaplace transformFluid dynamicsFlow (mathematics)Double layer (biology)VoltageBoundary value problemMaterials scienceLayer (electronics)PhysicsElectrophoresisIon
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical model for the AC electroosmotic flow in aqueous solutions is presented. It is assumed that the electrodes are ideally polarizable, the fluid is wellconducting, and the Debye double layer is much smaller than dimensions of the electrodes. The electric potential is calculated by solving the Laplace equation with the boundary conditions resulting from approximate analysis of the ionic concentration in the double layer. The net electric charge in this area interacts with the electric field, leading to generation of a force causing the fluid motion. The effect of voltage frequency on the electric field distribution and flow characteristics is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it