MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186830762 · doi:10.82308/51738

Sodium and Potassium in the Canadian total diet study

2010· article· en· W2186830762 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Corina M. Tanase

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotassiumSodiumFood scienceChemistryDietary Reference IntakeDietary SodiumFood groupNutrientMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium (Na) and potassium (K) are essential nutrients. We investigated Na and K content of foods collected from the 2007 Vancouver Total Diet Study (TDS). Our food nutrient content data showed that processed foods and soups had a high Na content while fluid milk, unprocessed meats and several fruits and vegetables had a high K content. The Na/K ratio indicated, with few exceptions, a segregation of the foods high in Na from ones high in K. Based on this data, new Na and K intakes were generated using Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS2.2), cycle 2.2 Nutrition dietary recall. In general, the results showed a lower Na intake than indicated by CCHS2.2, but still higher than the Tolerable Upper Level of Intake (UL). K intakes were similar to CCHS2.2 data showing an intake lower than the AI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207