Lithogeochemistry of Ordovician sedimentary rocks associated with Ni-Co stream-silt anomalies along Ritchie Brook, Kedgwick map area, northern New Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Upper Ordovician Grog Brook Group is composed of 1) a lower siltstone-dominated unit, 2) a thin-bedded carbonaceous and sulphidic shale unit, and 3) an upper sandstone-dominated unit. In the north-central part of the map area, which is traversed by Ritchie Brook, these units are spatially associated with magnetic and Ni-Co stream-silt anomalies. Twenty-one samples were collected along Ritchie Brook and analyzed for selected major and trace elements. The MnO content is higher in the sandstone-dominated unit than in the lower two units. Organic carbon content is greater within the lower two units, reflecting more reducing conditions and/or higher organic productivity at the time of deposition. The major-element content of the carbonaceous shale unit is indistinguishable from that of the siltstone-dominated unit. Although the carbonaceous shale is weakly 'metalliferous', it is not the source of the Ni and Co anomalies identified in the area. An unknown subjacent source is inferred.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".