MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186877820 · doi:10.1109/sips.2015.7345007

A 638 Mbps low-complexity rate 1/2 polar decoder on FPGAs

2015· article· en· W2186877820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStratixComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayPolar codeDecoding methodsLatency (audio)ThroughputVirtexPolarLow latency (capital markets)Code (set theory)Parallel computingAlgorithmComputer hardwareWirelessComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polar codes are capacity-achieving error-correcting codes with an explicit construction that can be decoded with low-complexity algorithms. In this work, we show how the state-of-the-art low-complexity decoding algorithm can be improved to better accommodate low-rate codes. Dedicated hardware is added to efficiently decode new constituent codes. Also, we use polar code construction alteration to further improve the latency and throughput. A polar decoder for a (1024, 512) code is implemented on two different FPGAs. It has 25% lower latency over the previous work and a coded throughput of 436 Mbps and 638 Mbps on the Xilinx Virtex 6 and Altera Stratix IV FPGAs, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207