MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2186956089

Potential CO2 geological storage sites for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in Québec St. Lawrence Lowlands - A preliminary analysis

2010· article· en· W2186956089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karine Bédard, Michel Malo, Yves Duchaine, Bernard Giroux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary rockGeologyEcological successionAquiferStructural basinCarbon capture and storage (timeline)GeochemistryGeomorphologyClimate changeGroundwaterOceanographyGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The St. Lawrence Lowlands platform and frontal thrust slices of the Appalachian belt are prospective for CO2 storage in the province of Quebec. The thick (1500 to 3000 meters) sedimentary succession hosts two types of reservoirs: deep saline aquifers in the platform and gas reservoirs in the fold-thrust belt. The Potsdam, Beekmantown and Trenton groups are identified as the potential reservoir formations in the St. Lawrence Lowlands sedimentary succession. A preliminary analysis of selected storage sites is used to evaluate theoretical and effective capacities for CO2 storage at the basin and reservoir scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207