Incomplete Reproductive Isolation in the Blue Mussel (<i>Mytilus edulis</i> and <i>M. trossulus</i>) Hybrid Zone in the Northwest Atlantic: Role of Gamete Interactions and Larval Viability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reproductive isolation in free-spawning organisms may involve only small changes in the gamete surface molecules that control fertilization, linking gamete incompatibility and speciation. Most studies have focused on species in which natural hybrids are absent and reproductive isolation is complete, but how gamete incompatibility evolves remains unclear. Reproductive isolation is incomplete between two sympatric mussel species (Mytilus edulis, M. trossulus) that hybridize in nature. In this study prezygotic and postzygotic components of reproductive incompatibility were examined in laboratory crosses. Conspecific crosses showed significantly greater rates of fertilization than heterospecific crosses, although some females of both species showed heterospecific gamete compatibility. The proportion of fertilized eggs developing into normal larvae was not significantly different between conspecific and heterospecific crosses, but survival of normal larvae was greater for conspecific crosses. Mixed-species sperm experiments suggested that conspecific sperm preference may further limit hybridization. The different components of reproductive incompatibility and total incompatibility varied among females of both species. Although our study has shown that partial reproductive isolation between M. edulis and M. trossulus involves both prezygotic gamete interactions and postzygotic larval survival, further research is required to determine the potential role of gamete incompatibility in the evolution of complete reproductive isolation between these species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".