Temperature dependence of cloned mammalian and salmonid cardiac Na<sup>+</sup>/Ca<sup>2+</sup> exchanger isoforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cardiac Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger (NCX), an important regulator of cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration in contraction and relaxation, has been shown in trout heart sarcolemmal vesicles to have high activity at 7 degrees C relative to its mammalian isoform. This unique property is likely due to differences in protein structure. In this study, outward NCX currents (I(NCX)) of the wild-type trout (NCX-TR1.0) and canine (NCX 1.1) exchangers expressed in oocytes were measured to explore the potential contributions of regulatory vs. transport mechanisms to this observation. cRNA was transcribed in vitro from both wild-type cDNA and was injected into Xenopus oocytes. I(NCX) of NCX-TR1.0 and NCX1.1 were measured after 3-4 days over a temperature range of 7-30 degrees C using the giant excised patch technique. The I(NCX) for both isoforms exhibited Na(+)-dependent inactivation and Ca(2+)-dependent positive regulation. The I(NCX) of NCX1.1 exhibited typical mammalian temperature sensitivities with Q(10) values of 2.4 and 2.6 for peak and steady-state currents, respectively. However, the I(NCX) of NCX-TR1.0 was relatively temperature insensitive with Q(10) values of 1.2 and 1.1 for peak and steady-state currents, respectively. I(NCX) current decay was fit with a single exponential, and the resultant rate constant of inactivation (lambda) was determined as a function of temperature. As expected, lambda decreased monotonically with temperature for both isoforms. Although lambda was significantly greater in NCX1.1 compared with NCX-TR1.0 at all temperatures, the effect of temperature on lambda was not different between the two isoforms. These data suggest that the disparities in I(NCX) temperature dependence between these two exchanger isoforms are unlikely due to differences in their inactivation kinetics. In addition, similar differences in temperature dependence were observed in both isoforms after alpha-chymotrypsin treatment that renders the exchanger in a deregulated state. These data suggest that the differences in I(NCX) temperature dependence between the two isoforms are not due to potential disparities in either the I(NCX) regulatory mechanisms or structural differences in the cytoplasmic loop but are likely predicated on differences within the transmembrane segments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".