KINETIC ESTIMATION OF GABAPENTIN AND ETORICOXIB IN PHARMACEUTICALS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kinetic spectrophotometric methods have been developed and validated for the determination of Analgesics drugs, Gabapentin and Etoricoxib in their pharmaceutical dosage forms. The method is based on the oxidation of Gabapentin and Etoricoxib with alkaline and acidic potassium permanganate respectively. In alkaline medium permanganate (Mn+7) oxidizes Gabapentin and undergoes one electron reduction to give a green colored manganate ions (Mn+6) which has wavelength maximum at 610 nm, and unreacted permanganate at 526 nm. In acidic medium the course of the reaction was conveniently followed by measuring the absorbance of permanganate at 526 nm, as the permanganate undergoes five electrons reduction to give divalent manganese ions (Mn+2) . The calibration graphs for both drugs are linear in the concentration ranges from 17.2 – 86 µg/ml and 35.9 – 35 µg/ml for fixed time and rate constant methods respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".