MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187146872

MEDICAL STUDENTS' AND RESIDENTS' EXPERIENCES WITH CULTURAL SENSITIVITY TRAINING - UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA

2004· article· en· W2187146872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nahid Azad, Barbara Power, Janet Dollin, Stephanie Amos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultural sensitivityCultural competenceNegotiationCultural diversityMedical educationMedicineQuality (philosophy)PerceptionPsychologyNursingSociologyPedagogyAnthropologySocial sciencePsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An increasingly diverse society requires physicians to be able to competently treat those with whom they do not share ancestry and/or culture. However, physicians and patients may see cultural issues as barriers to a successful clinical encounter. In addition, dominant cultures may have their own perceptions of what constitutes standard quality clinical care. Furthermore, many physicians struggle to be culturally competent and avoid racial stereotyping, as they can be sensitive to cultural differences, but remain unable to negotiate them in communication with patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207