The Como-Hudson Factories (c. 1845-77): Results of Geochemical Analyses for Québec's First Known Glassworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Des echantillions de verre provenant de trois vitreries du milieu du 19ieme siecle dans la region de Como-Hudson ont ete analyses pour leur elements majeurs et mineurs, ainsi que certains elements traces. Ces donnees indiquent que le sable brun local est insuffisament siliceux pour avoir ete utilise dans la manufacture de ces verres. Donc, elles n'appuient pas l'evidence historique du contraire. Bien que le les contenus en elements majeurs des verres de Como et de Hudson se chevauchent, ils se distinguent par rapport a des vitres d'usines contemporaines de l'Ontario par leur contenu en CaO, Na 2 O, MgO, and Al 2 O 3 . Cependant, la possibilite de la vitre brisee importee ait ete utilisee par les vitreries anciennes souligne le fait que des precautions sont de mise quand des echantillions de verre provenant des sites excaves sont consideres pour des etudes de provenance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".