MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187332063 · doi:10.21083/jeso.v145i0.3733

New range records, and a comparison of sweep netting and malaise trap catches of horse flies and deer flies (Diptera: Tabanidae) in northern Ontario

2016· article· en· W2187332063 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John L. Ringrose, Kenneth F. Abraham, David Beresford

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and ForestryTrent University
FundersTrent UniversityMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsNettingMalaiseBiologyRange (aeronautics)EcologyZoologyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Horse flies and deer flies (Diptera: Tabanidae) were surveyed in northern Ontario, Canada in 2011, at 11 sites, and 2012, at 12 sites using Malaise traps and daily sweep netting. A total of 2168 tabanids representing 30 species: 10 Chrysops, 18 Hybomitra, and two Tabanus were collected. Malaise traps caught fewer individuals than sweep netting but more species: 850 tabanids of 28 species, eight of which were not caught by sweep netting. Sweep netting caught 1318 tabanids of 22 species, with two not found in Malaise trap samples. The first record of Hybomitra osburni (Hine) in Ontario, and range extensions for several other species are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Entomological Society of OntarioSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207