MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187451558

An assessment of DInSAR potential for simulating geological subsurface structure

2013· article· en· W2187451558 on OpenAlexaff
Negin Fouladi Moghaddam, Christoph Rüdiger, Sergey Samsonov, Jeffrey P. Walker, Walter David Michael Hall

Bibliographic record

VenueCongress on Modelling and Simulation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDeformation (meteorology)Remote sensingInterferometrySubsidenceSatelliteDeformation monitoringGeodesyInterferometric synthetic aperture radarGNSS augmentationGeophysicsSeismologySynthetic aperture radarStructural basinGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are three main focus areas in this research: the monitoring of surface deformation, the simulation of the subsurface structure, and the retrieval of the required subsurface parameters through the use of remotely sensed surface observations to improve the available structural models. To achieve these goals, as an initial step the areas which are susceptible to surface deformation due to ground water extraction are pinpointed using Multidimensional Small Baseline Subset (MSBAS) technique for interferometric pairs of C-, L- and Xband SAR datasets. These observations identify the potential regions for any geological boundaries such as faults or changes in the formation sequence which may have an impact on observed vertical and horizontal deformation signals. For the next stage, it is proposed that these observations could be applied for geophysical inverse modelling to assess the temporal behaviour and impact of boundaries for the observed deformation. By estimating the best parameter space through inverse modelling, it is hypothesized that the previously available subsurface structural model provided by integration of multiple geophysical datasets like seismic, gravity, radiometric and magnetic, may be improved in conjunction with SAR interferometry. For the Surat Basin, preliminary DInSAR results (ERS-Envisat C-band; 1992 to 2005) show considerable deformation patterns in 2004-2005. These signals are still present in the 2012-2013 interferograms and are coincident with regional underground activities, confirming the anthropogenic impact on subsidence. While this is a promising development, accurate and long term measurement of deformation using such sparse satellite dataset is still difficult to achieve and a more advanced DInSAR processing algorithm for integrating various space-borne SAR data with different acquisition parameters (i.e. temporal sampling, spatial resolution, wave-band and polarization, etc.) is required. This will improve the temporal and spatial resolution of the interferograms. In this study, first results of the DInSAR processing chain over the Surat Basin, including a discussion on the optimization scheme layout are proposed for future use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCongress on Modelling and SimulationSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207