MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187483069

CANADIAN-MADE BINOCULARS, Part 2: BOP & CAL retrofits of RELs in the early 1950s©

2015· article· en· W2187483069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robin Leech

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrismWorld War IIMeteorologyAeronauticsEngineeringGeographyOpticsArchaeologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the start of the Korean War in June 1950, the Canadian Government found itself without adequate military equipment, including binoculars. Starting in 1950, and ending in 1953, Canadian Arsenals Ltd (C.A.L.) of Long Branch, Ontario, and Beaconing Optical & Precision Materials (B.O.P.) of Granby, Quebec, were contracted to retrofit remaining or recalled WWII REL 6X30 and 7X50 binoculars. These retrofit binoculars were to provide the Canadian troops for the duration of the Korean War. Some of the 7X50s were specially modified by BOP to have internal filters (based on the British WWII 7X50 Barr & Stroud CF41): Very Dark-Dark-YellowClear for both ocular columns. Further, the optics were coated during the retrofits. The external lenses at least were coated in both the BOP and CAL (retrofits) conversions. The 6X30 REL binoculars were retrofitted with coated optics by CAL, but they underwent fewer visible changes than did the 7X50 REL binoculars by BOP. The CAL and BOP refits are indicated by the printing on both prism covers. In some cases the original REL prism cover data were deleted, either by being milled out or struck out, and can no longer be read. Often the deleted data are reprinted on another location on the prism covers. The REL 6X30 binoculars may vary in weight as much as 200g, depending on the materials used (e.g., aluminum vs brass). This is Part 2 of three articles on Canadian-made binoculars. Part 1 (Leech 2015a) discusses the WWII Research Enterprises Ltd binoculars made at Leaside, ON, and Part 3 (Leech & Kubetz 2015) discusses the 7X50 ELCAN binoculars made by Ernst Leitz Canada, of Midland, Ontario. Included is discussion of the ELCAN replacements in 1999/2000 by the 7X30 and 7X50 Fujinon binoculars which have special optical coatings and anti-laser filters for military use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207