MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187570028

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF HEAT TRANSPORT WITHIN FRACTURED SEDIMENTARY ROCK: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEMPERATURE PROBES

2007· article· en· W2187570028 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Molson, P. Pehme, John A. Cherry, Beth L. Parker

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBoreholeOverburdenGroundwater rechargeAquiferHydrogeologyFracture (geology)Groundwater flowGroundwaterSedimentary rockAdvectionMatrix (chemical analysis)DolostonePetrologyGeophysicsGeomorphologyVadose zoneThermal conductionMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringCarbonate rockGeochemistryMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal energy transport from ground surface into a fractured sedimentary rock aquifer is simulated numerically to gain insight into the response of temperature probes for identifying hydraulically active fractures in rock boreholes. The conceptual hydrogeological model is based on a field study site at Guelph, Ontario, Canada, where thin sandy overburden overlies a densely-fractured dolostone. Characterizing the fracture network is important in this area for understanding the behaviour of DNAPL contaminants at nearby industrial sites. The model includes density-dependent groundwater flow coupled with thermal advection, conduction, and retardation within the porous matrix and discrete fractures. The fracture elements are generated stochastically and are coupled directly with the porous medium matrix blocks. Natural background flow gradients, surface recharge and seasonally variable surface temperatures are also considered. The results show that ground source thermal pulses can propagate deep into a fractured rock system and appear as weak thermal “anomalies” within the fractures on the order of a few tenths or hundredths of degrees. Such anomalies are now becoming detectable with state-of-the-art thermal probe technologies and can be potentially valuable natural signals for identifying hydraulically active fracture zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207