MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187686889

Integrating Vision Derived Bearing Measurements with Differential GPS and UWB Ranges for Vehicle-to-vehicle Relative Navigation.

2013· article· en· W2187686889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elmira Amirloo Abolfathi, Kyle O’Keefe

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Differential GPSGlobal Positioning SystemComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Differential (mechanical device)Computer visionRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeodesyEngineeringGeologyTelecommunicationsAerospace engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper Vehicle-to-Vehicle navigation is reviewed and the augmentation of between vehicle moving base stations differential GPS with ultra-wideband range measurements and vision derived bearing measurements is proposed. A method for deriving bearing measurements from video data is introduced theoretically and then demonstrated. Real data collected with two vehicles driving on a city street in Calgary is then used to demonstrate the method. The initial results show small errors in vision derived bearing measurements. The augmentation of DGPS with vision derived bearing measurements and UWB range measurements shows an improvement in the horizontal navigation solution provided that the range and bearing measurements are free from systematic errors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 26th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2013)Same topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207