Stationarity Enforcement of Accelerator Based TRNG by Genetic Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Random numbers generated by pseudo-random and true random number generators (TRNG), are used in a wide variety of applications. A TRNG relies on a nondeterministic source to produce random numbers. In this paper, we develop a TRNG using a heuristic evolutionary algorithm together with signal processing techniques. Our proposed algorithm consists of three phases:(i) Extraction: where a noise source(such as race conditions during concurrent memory accesses on a GPU) is sampled into random numbers, (ii) Exact Histogram Equalization: takes the output from (i) and delivers a specified output distribution, (iii) Stationarity Enforcement: using a genetic algorithm, the output of (ii) is permuted until the random numbers meet wide sense stationarity within a specified quality defined by Gaussian distribution with the expected standard deviation on the power spectral density of random numbers. We propose guideline parameters for the evolutionary algorithm to ensure fast convergence, within the first 100 generations, with a standard deviation over the specified quality level of less than 0.02.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it