A cognitive analysis of the Bulgarian prepositions and verbal prefixes NAD and POD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cognitive analysis of the Bulgarian prepositions and verbal prefixes NAD and PODThis paper analyzes the Bulgarian prepositions and verbal prefixes NAD and POD from a cognitive linguistic perspective.Their prototypical senses are presented as a trajector (TR) situated above or below a landmark (LM), an idealized cognitive model that is neutral with respect to vertical alignment and contact between the TR and LM.The networks of NAD and POD each exhibit a common semantic core stemming from the central spatial sense of each term, close connections between prefixes and prepositions, consistent spatial-metaphorical meaning shifts, and structural similarities between NAD and POD that are often opposites (which can be represented as reversed mirror images) of each other.Analyzing spatial terms such as NAD and POD in this way has explanatory power and the potential to help learners and teachers of Bulgarian see the connection between verticality and metaphor, make sense of the polysemy of these spatial terms, and learn or explain them more easily.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it