Quality of Life in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with significant cardiovascular andcerebrovascular morbidity and mortality. Usual parameters studied in sleep laboratoryare unable to measure overall impact of OSA on human life. Consequently, it isimportant to measure Quality of Life (QoL) in OSA. QoL can be measured with genericinstruments like SF-36 or OSA specific questionnaires like Calgary Sleep ApneaQuality of Life (SAQLI) questionnaire. Most of the studies suggest that there issignificant impairment of QoL in patients of OSA. But the present evidence suggeststhat impairment in QoL is not proportional to severity of OSA. There is no consensus onthe question of improvement in QoL with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure(CPAP) therapy. A recent Cochrane review concluded that CPAP improves QoL inpeople with moderate and severe OSA.Key words : Obstructive sleep apnea, Quality of Life, Continuous Positive AirwayPressure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".