MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2187881536

A Race Model of Perceptual Forced Choice Reaction Time

2003· article· en· W2187881536 on OpenAlexaff
David E. Huber, Denis Cousineau

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPriming (agriculture)PerceptionComputer scienceMathematicsSpeech recognitionEconometricsStatisticsAlgorithmPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a race model for forced-choice data that provides a unified account of both latency and accuracy.The model is applied in the domain of short-term priming, but could characterize many other response tasks.A series of perceptual identification experiments found systematic bias changes as a function of prime duration.Notably, reaction times (RTs) were observed to change along with response bias.Furthermore, correct RTs changed in an opposite manner to error RTs.These results are explained by assuming a race between choice alternatives.The theory provides an alternative to signal detection theory, with faster finish times, rather than greater signal strength, determining both accuracy and RT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFrench-language works237,207