MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2188155546

The development of light ion injector for the plasma diagnostic system based on beam emission spectroscopy

2012· article· en· W2188155546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A.A. Chmyga, G. Deshko, S. M. Khrebtov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe scientific electronic library of periodicals of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic physicsIon beamIon gunPlasmaIonBeam (structure)Plasma diagnosticsChemistryMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of light ion injector and neutralizer for the BES plasma diagnostic system and its first experimental results are presented in this work. This injector will be used for neutral beam plasma diagnostic systems. Diagnostic systems based on neutral beams of Li or Na atoms can be used to study the spatial plasma density profiles, impurity ions and magnetic field distribution in the border region of the plasma fusion devices. This method is based on the detection of the probe beam glow of atoms excited by the plasma electrons. These diagnostic systems consist of two main parts – the neutral beam injector (including the ion beam accelerator and neutralizer) and the secondary light signal registration system. Light ion beam accelerator based on the five-electrode ion-optical system, in contrast to the classical three-electrode system, delivers beams of lithium or sodium with current 3…5 mA at a beam energy 20…25 keV. The neutralizer is based on the supersonic jet of sodium vapor formed by Laval nozzle. The first experiments of neutralizing the ion beam with a transverse supersonic atomic jet was done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe scientific electronic library of periodicals of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→