THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
REQUEST FOR QUOTE #JM-103012-01 STREET LIGHT POLE REPLACEMENT Dear Sir/Madam: Quotations, clearly marked as to contents will be received by Jennifer Musson, Senior Buyer, 400 City Hall Square East, Suite 403, Windsor, Ontario, N9A 7K6, up to and including ELEVEN-THIRTY FIFTY-NINE (11:30:59) A.M. (E.S.T), THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2012, to supply and install street light poles at various locations throughout the City of Windsor. The Contractor shall furnish a Security Deposit in the form of a certified cheque, bank draft, money order, or irrevocable letter of credit payable, in Canadian currency, to The Corporation of the City of Windsor in the amount of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00) to be submitted with quotation. The Security Deposit of the successful bidder will be held as a performance security and released upon satisfactory job completion. Do not submit a Bid Bond. A bid bond is not acceptable for this RFQ. Specifications and form of quotation will be available at no charge at the Purchasing Division, 400 City Hall Square East, Suite 403, Windsor, Ontario, or email: purchasing@city.windsor.on.ca. There will be no public opening for this Request for Quotation. Acceptance or rejection of any quotation will be made in accordance with City of Windsor Purchasing By-Law No. 93-2012. Yours truly, THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF WINDSOR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.626 | 0.319 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".