MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188331147 · doi:10.7202/1033252ar

Catholicisme social, anticommunisme et nationalisme en Ontario français : le cas de figure du père Gustave Sauvé, o.m.i. (1930-1960)

2015· article· fr· W2188331147 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
François-Olivier Dorais

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilCanadian Society of Church HistoryFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose d’analyser l’itinéraire intellectuel et professionnel du père Gustave Sauvé o.m.i., lequel fut, entre 1930 et 1950, l’un des principaux publicistes chrétiens de l’Ontario français. Fondateur puis directeur d’une école d’Action catholique à l’Université d’Ottawa, figure d’avant-scène de la mouvance anti-communiste canadienne et directeur du Secrétariat de l’Association canadienne-française d’éducation de l’Ontario de 1944 à 1961, le père Sauvé constitue un cas d’étude privilégié pour mieux comprendre l’insertion, jusqu’ici peu étudiée, du catholicisme social en milieu francophone minoritaire. De même, l’action militante de cet oblat nous porte au coeur des mutations propres au catholicisme canadien-français d’avant 1960, plus particulièrement en ce qui a trait aux rapports évolutifs entre catholicisme et nationalisme, devenus facteurs de discorde durant l’entre-deux guerres. Sur ce point, cet article entend montrer que Sauvé, tout engagé qu’il fut envers sa mission apostolique, ne s’est jamais pour autant éloigné d’une exigence de combat national pour la survivance française en Ontario, inscrivant ainsi son action dans la mouvance du nationalisme groulxiste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207