Catholicisme social, anticommunisme et nationalisme en Ontario français : le cas de figure du père Gustave Sauvé, o.m.i. (1930-1960)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose d’analyser l’itinéraire intellectuel et professionnel du père Gustave Sauvé o.m.i., lequel fut, entre 1930 et 1950, l’un des principaux publicistes chrétiens de l’Ontario français. Fondateur puis directeur d’une école d’Action catholique à l’Université d’Ottawa, figure d’avant-scène de la mouvance anti-communiste canadienne et directeur du Secrétariat de l’Association canadienne-française d’éducation de l’Ontario de 1944 à 1961, le père Sauvé constitue un cas d’étude privilégié pour mieux comprendre l’insertion, jusqu’ici peu étudiée, du catholicisme social en milieu francophone minoritaire. De même, l’action militante de cet oblat nous porte au coeur des mutations propres au catholicisme canadien-français d’avant 1960, plus particulièrement en ce qui a trait aux rapports évolutifs entre catholicisme et nationalisme, devenus facteurs de discorde durant l’entre-deux guerres. Sur ce point, cet article entend montrer que Sauvé, tout engagé qu’il fut envers sa mission apostolique, ne s’est jamais pour autant éloigné d’une exigence de combat national pour la survivance française en Ontario, inscrivant ainsi son action dans la mouvance du nationalisme groulxiste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".