NMDA and AMPA Receptors in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus Shape Binaural Responses in Rat Inferior Colliculus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Binaural responses of single neurons in the rat's central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) were recorded before and after local injection of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists (either 1,2, 3,4-tetrahydro-6-nitro-2,3-dioxo-benzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide disodium [NBQX], (+/-)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid [CPP], 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione [CNQX], or (+/-)-2amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid [APV]) into the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus (DNLL). Responses were evoked by clicks delivered separately to the two ears at interaural time delays between -1.0 and +30 ms (positive values referring to ipsilateral leading contralateral click pairs). The neurons in our sample were excited by contralateral stimulation and inhibited by ipsilateral stimulation, and the probability of action potentials was reduced as the ipsilateral stimulus was advanced. Binaural inhibition resulted in response suppression that lasted up to 30 ms. Injection of excitatory amino acid antagonists into the DNLL contralateral to the recording site reduced the strength of binaural inhibition in the ICC. The alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist NBQX preferentially affected responses at small interaural time intervals (0-1.0 ms), whereas the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist CPP preferentially affected responses at longer intervals (1-30 ms). Both CNQX and APV produced a release from binaural inhibition, but neither drug was selective for specific intervals. The data support the idea that binaural inhibition in the rat ICC is influenced by both AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory events in the contralateral DNLL. The results suggest that the AMPA receptors contribute selectively to the initial component of binaural inhibition and the NMDA receptors to a longer lasting component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".