MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188555449 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2015.7343306

Self-interference cancellation with phase-noise suppression in full-duplex systems

2015· article· en· W2188555449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhase noiseNoise (video)Interference (communication)Channel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringNoise measurementActive noise controlSingle antenna interference cancellationSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)TelecommunicationsAlgorithmNoise reductionEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we focus on the self-interference (SI) cancellation in the presence of phase-noise in full-duplex systems. Reducing the SI needs the estimation of the SI channel and the phase-noise. In particular, the time-varying phase-noise process is approximated by an expansion over a basis. As the unknown intended signal received from the other transceiver can limit the estimation performance if considered as additive noise, we incorporate it in the joint estimation of the SI channel, the intended channel and the phase-noise process. The proposed algorithm maximizes the likelihood function by fully exploiting the known transmitted data and the second-order statistic of the intended signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207