MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188576392 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2015.0649

Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problems with Quadratic Costs Structure

2015· article· en· W2188576392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVehicle routing problemQuadratic equationAlgorithmBranch and cutHeuristicRouting (electronic design automation)Mathematical optimizationMetaheuristicComputer scienceMathematicsInteger programming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we introduce the quadratic capacitated vehicle routing problem (QCVRP) motivated by two applications in engineering and logistics: the capacitated vehicle routing problem with angle penalties (angle-CVRP) and the capacitated vehicle routing problem with reload costs (CVRP-RC). We introduce a three-index vehicle-flow formulation of the problem, which is strengthened with valid inequalities, and we derive a branch-and-cut algorithm capable of providing tight lower bounds and solving small- to medium-size instances in short to moderate computing times. Furthermore, we present a hybrid metaheuristic capable of providing high quality solutions in short computing times. The two algorithms are tested on several instances from the CVRP literature modified to mimic the two problems that motivate our study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it