MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2188600889 · doi:10.58799/nmg-v33n1.3

Chronology of colluvial apron deposition within Canada del Buey, Pajarito Plateau, New Mexico

2011· article· en· W2188600889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth Lepper, Kelly Crowell, Cathy J. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Mexico Geology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColluviumChronologyGeologyPlateau (mathematics)CanyonSedimentary depositional environmentHoloceneOptically stimulated luminescencePleistoceneAeolian processesDeposition (geology)PaleontologyGeomorphologySedimentAlluvium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation uses optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating to examine the chronology of colluvial apron development and to help constrain long-term process rates within the mesa and canyon systems of the Pajarito Plateau in north-central New Mexico. In addition to ages, the OSL data provide insight into the dynamic interactions of surface processes within the mesa and canyon systems. Our results can be interpreted to suggest that foot-slope deposits within Canada del Buey represent a complex interplay of depositional processes in which eolian inputs from outside of the Pajarito Plateau play a role. Depositional ages, both on the mesa top and in foot slopes, record episodic inputs to the system in the late Pleistocene, middle Holocene, and late Holocene. These periods correlate well to eolian activity and significant climatic events in the Southern Plains and desert Southwest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Mexico Geology→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→