MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188606027 · doi:10.82308/34352

Short-term and long-term SPI drought forecasts using wavelet neural networks and wavelet support vector regression in the Awash river basin of Ethiopia

2012· article· en· W2188606027 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anteneh Belayneh

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTerm (time)WaveletArtificial neural networkSupport vector machineRegressionArtificial intelligenceGeographyComputer scienceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethiopia's climate variability coupled with the country's heavy reliance on rain-fed agriculture make it vulnerable to the impacts of drought. This vulnerability is evident in the Awash River Basin, where a significant proportion of the population is dependent on international food assistance for survival. Given this vulnerability to drought, effective drought forecasts are an essential tool for effective water resource management as well as mitigation of some of the more adverse consequences of drought. This study forecast the Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) on both short-term and long-term lead times. For short-term forecasts this study computed SPI 1 and SPI 3, short-term drought indicators which represent agricultural drought. For long-term forecasts, SPI 12 and SPI 24 were computed. These two indices are long-term drought indicators which represent hydrological drought conditions.The SPI forecasts were done using five data driven models. Forecasts were compared between two machine learning techniques: artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector regression (SVR). The results from these two techniques were compared to a traditional stochastic forecast model, namely an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. In addition, ANN and SVR models were coupled with wavelet analysis (WA) to produce wavelet-neural network (WA-ANN) and wavelet-support vector regression (WA-SVR) models. This study proposed and explored, for the first time, SVR and WA-SVR methods for short term and long term SPI drought forecasting at different lead times.Traditionally, the number of wavelet decompositions of a time series (for forecasting applications) are determined either by trial and error or using the formula L = int[log(N)], with N being the number of samples. This study found that in almost all cases the approximation series after decomposition, and not the detail series, yielded the best forecast results. The decomposition level which had the approximation that yielded the best forecast results was determined to be the appropriate decomposition.With regards to ANN model architecture, traditionally the optimal number of neurons in the hidden layer is either determined using a trial and error procedure, or is determined empirically to be log (N) or 2n+1, where n is the number of input layers. This study combined all these approaches. The empirical methods helped establish upper and lower bounds for the optimal number of neurons within the hidden layer. After an interval was determined, a trial and error procedure was used to determine the optimal number of neurons in the hidden layer.The forecasts in this study were evaluated using a measure of persistence, R2, RMSE, and MAE. The forecast results indicate that WA-ANN and WA-SVR models were the most accurate methods for forecasting the SPI on both short and long-term time scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207