Study of the Efficacy of Low-Level Laser in Myocardial Perfusion of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background- A sizable portion of patients with angina pectoris secondary to underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) can be effectively treated. Anti-anginal medication has proven efficacious in most patients, and percutaneous coronary revascularization or coronary artery bypass grafting can successfully treat the rest. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) via its direct, heat-independent effect on the process of tissue repair may play a significant role in the treatment of patients with advanced CAD. We aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of LLLT in advanced multi-vessel CAD patients not suitable for myocardial revascularization. We evaluated various clinical parameters as well as the results of laboratory tests to seek the indices of the potential impact of laser therapy on the study population. Method- Twenty-two patients (mean age, 61 years old and male gender, 68.1%) with advanced CAD and a history of myocardial infarction underwent two series of irradiation therapy, each series comprising 10 sessions of LLLT and conducted with a three-month interval. In each series, LLLT was administered every other day for 20 minutes per session (excluding one session that lasted only 10 minutes). The pre-laser evaluation consisted of blood pressure, heart rate, basic biochemical test, electrocardiogram (ECG), six-minute walk test, transthoracic echocardiography, and ECG-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging. Three months later, the pre-laser evaluation was repeated. Results- No side effects associated with laser biostimulation or performed clinical tests were noted. An improvement in functional class, and distance covered in the six-minute walk test and decrease in systolic blood pressure was observed. There was also a significant change in the myocardial perfusion of most anterior segments of the heart according to SPECT (visually and by computer software, P<0.05). There was no significant change in diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction by transthoracic echocardiography, and ECGgated SPECT. Conclusion- LLLT resulted in an improvement in functional capacity and myocardial perfusion as well as a reduction in the frequency of angina symptoms during the six-minute walk test. There were no significant changes, however, in the left ventricular function according to transthoracic echocardiography and ECG-gated SPECT. In the short term, LLLT proved to be a safe method. These encouraging results should be confirmed by larger, placebo-controlled studies (Iranian Heart Journal 2010; 11 (4):6-15).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".