MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2188707087

Epidemiology of passive smoke: a prospective study in 589 children.

2005· article· en· W2188707087 on OpenAlexaff
A Cantani, M Micera

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPediatric health and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity Hospital Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWheezeAsthmaAtopyPassive smokingPediatricsRisk factorAllergyIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyTobacco smokeFamily historyEnvironmental healthImmunologyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia is not yet completely known. Several mechanisms have been suggested as having a role in symptom onset and impaired gastric accommodation to meal is one of the most frequent. This review will focus on the pathophysiological and clinical aspects of this abnormality. EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION SOURCES: Medical peer-reviewed literature was considered to elucidate the role of gastric accommodation in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia. STATE OF THE ART: Impaired gastric accommodation to meal is present in around 40% of patients with functional dyspepsia and it was shown to be associated with the presence of early satiety. Unfortunately, a definitive treatment of this abnormality with fundus-relaxing drugs is not yet available. PERSPECTIVES: Further studies are needed to better clarify the role of each single pathophysiological mechanism on clinical manifestations of functional dyspepsia. Research is still ongoing to offer a valid therapeutic approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPediatric health and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207