MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2188744192

The ups and downs in developing an under-ice moored profiler called the ICYCLER

2007· article· en· W2188744192 on OpenAlexaffabout
S.J. Prinsenberg, Roger Pettipas, George A. Fowler, Greg Siddall

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMooringOceanographySea iceArcticArchipelagoGeologyWind profilerEnvironmental scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ICYCLER is a moored oceanographic profiler designed to measure surface layer water properties under mobile ice cover. The instrumentation is deployed in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago to measure the surface properties passing from the Arctic Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean. The profiler is designed to provide daily 50-meter salinity-temperature-chlorophyll profiles for a full year. A description of the ICYCLER design was presented at the ISOPE2003 conference (Fowler et al., 2004). An ICYCLER prototype was successfully used in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago during a year-long deployment. A second re-designed ICYCLER was deployed in the summer of 2004 but was not recovered until 2 years later. Simultaneous ice and oceanographic events caused the mooring to move 11miles eastwards into deeper waters where its buoyancy tank collapsed and the entire mooring sank to the bottom. Data presented showed that ice may have snagged the sensor float when it remained near the surface for a day because of excessive cable resulting from strong ocean currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→