Glucocorticoid modulation of protein phosphorylation and sarcoplasmic reticulum function in rat myocardium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To decipher the mechanism(s) underlying glucocorticoid action on cardiac contractile function, this study investigated the effects of adrenalectomy and dexamethasone treatment on the contents of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+)-cycling proteins, their phosphorylation by endogenous Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaM kinase II), and SR Ca(2+) sequestration in the rat myocardium. Cardiac SR vesicles from adrenalectomized rats displayed significantly diminished rates of ATP-energized Ca(2+) uptake in vitro compared with cardiac SR vesicles from control rats; in vivo administration of dexamethasone to adrenalectomized rats prevented the decline in SR function. Western immunoblotting analysis showed that the relative protein amounts of ryanodine receptor/Ca(2+)-release channel, Ca(2+)-ATPase, calsequestrin, and phospholamban were neither diminished significantly by adrenalectomy nor elevated by dexamethasone treatment. However, the relative amount of SR-associated CaM kinase II protein was increased 2.5- to 4-fold in dexamethasone-treated rats compared with control and adrenalectomized rats. Endogenous CaM kinase II activity, as judged from phosphorylation of ryanodine receptor, Ca(2+)-ATPase, and phospholamban protein, was also significantly higher (50--80% increase) in the dexamethasone-treated rats. The stimulatory effect of CaM kinase II activation on Ca(2+) uptake activity of SR was significantly depressed after adrenalectomy and greatly enhanced after dexamethasone treatment. These findings identify the SR as a major target for glucocorticoid actions in the heart and implicate modification of the SR CaM kinase II system as a component of the mechanisms by which dexamethasone influences SR Ca(2+)-cycling and myocardial contraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".